Distinguishing emotional empathy from emotional over-indulgence
- Mar 3
- 4 min read
In the quiet corners of our classrooms at HEI Schools, we often witness moments that define a child’s character. A child cries because it is time to put away the blocks. A parent, moved by the sight of their child’s tears, might be tempted to grant "just five more minutes" to stop the crying. In that singular moment, we see the intersection of two paths: one leads to Emotional Intelligence, and the other leads to Over-indulgence.
As we navigate the beautiful complexities of raising children in Vietnam’s rapidly changing social landscape, it is vital to understand that a child’s tears are not a sign of parental failure, but an opportunity for pedagogical growth.
1. The science of the feeling brain vs. the thinking brain
To understand the boundary between empathy and spoiling, we must first look at the child's biology. A young child’s brain is dominated by the Amygdala (the emotional centre) while the Prefrontal Cortex (the centre for logic and impulse control) is still under heavy construction.

When we practice Empathy, we are acknowledging the child’s Amygdala. We are saying, "I see that you are angry/sad/disappointed." This validation is scientifically proven to lower cortisol levels and help the child return to a state of calm. However, Over-indulgence occurs when we allow the child’s temporary emotional state to rewrite the rules of the environment.
If we change the boundary just to soothe the emotion, we deprive the child’s Prefrontal Cortex of the "exercise" it needs to develop resilience. At HEI, we believe in "co-regulation": sharing our calm with the child, not joining their chaos. We validate the feeling, but we hold the line on the behaviour.
2. Emotional Validation is Not Agreement
A common misconception in modern "gentle parenting" is the idea that to empathise with a child, we must agree with their demands. This is where the boundary often breaks.
Empathy says, "I understand you really wanted that toy, and it feels very hard to say goodbye to it right now."
Over-indulgence says, "Oh, don't cry! Fine, you can have the toy, please stop being sad."
In the first example, we are teaching Emotional Literacy. We are giving the child a vocabulary for their internal world. In the second example, we are teaching the child that their emotions are a tool for manipulation. Over time, this creates a "Fragile Power", a child who feels they are in charge of the adults, which actually leads to increased anxiety because the child subconsciously knows they are not equipped to lead.
Following the Finnish National Core Curriculum (2022), we focus on transversal competences, specifically "Taking care of oneself and managing daily life." This requires children to face small disappointments within a supportive framework.
3. The "Culture of Trust" and the Necessity of "No"

At HEI Schools, our "Culture of Trust" extends to the belief that children are capable of handling big emotions. If we always shield a child from disappointment, we are essentially telling them, "I don't think you are strong enough to handle being sad."
True empathy involves sitting with a child in their discomfort without rushing to "fix" it. In the Vietnamese context, where the "Grandparent effect" or the desire to provide a "perfect" childhood often leads to over-protection, this can be a difficult shift. However, a "No" delivered with warmth is a gift of safety.
Boundaries provide the "walls" of a child’s world. Within these walls, they are free to explore. Without them, the world feels vast and terrifying. When we indulge every emotional whim, we effectively tear down those walls, leaving the child feeling unmoored.
4. Implementation: The HEI Way of Holding Boundaries
How do we practically apply this in the classroom and at home? We use a three-step approach: Acknowledge, Limit, and Redirect.
Acknowledge (The Heart): "You are feeling very frustrated that we have to come inside from the garden."
Limit (The Boundary): "But the garden is closing now so we can have our healthy snack."
Redirect (The Growth): "Would you like to hop like a bunny or stomp like a dinosaur on our way to the table?"
This method respects the child’s dignity while maintaining the operational flow of the school. It ensures that the child feels heard, but not "in charge" of the safety and schedule that keeps them healthy.

5. Long-term Risks of Over-indulgence
My research in child psychology suggests that children who are chronically over-indulged emotionally struggle significantly when they enter primary school and later adulthood. They often have lower "Frustration Tolerance" and struggle with peer relationships because they expect the world to adapt to their emotional state.
By choosing empathy over indulgence, we are raising children who are "Emotionally Robust." They know that they can feel a "big feeling," survive it, and move forward. This is the ultimate form of self-regulation.
References
Brene Brown. (2018). Dare to lead: Brave work. Tough conversations. Whole hearts. Random House.
Clarke, J. I., Dawson, C., & Bredehoft, D. J. (2014). How much is too much? Raising likable, responsible, respectful children - from toddlers to teens - in an age of overindulgence. Da Capo Lifelong Books.
Finnish National Agency for Education. (2022). National core curriculum for early childhood education and care 2022. Finnish National Agency for Education.
Goleman, D. (2006). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ (10th anniversary ed.). Bantam Books.
Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1997). Meta-emotion: How families communicate emotionally. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Shanker, S. (2016). Self-reg: How to help your child (and you) break the stress cycle and successfully engage with life. Penguin Press.
Siegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2012). The whole-brain child: 12 revolutionary strategies to nurture your child's developing mind. Bantam Books.
.png)
Comments